Sunday, 19 May 2013

Representations of a Soap Opera Narrative By Lea Weller BA



 The name ‘soap opera’ comes from the original radio dramas of the early twentieth century, originating from America. Britain’s radio serials made a success, mainly getting its ratings from female listeners. When the serials moved to television, the majority of viewers were female. Brook writes

Because these early daily radio serials were aimed at a predominantly female audience, they were generally sponsored by household goods companies, detergents and soap being particularly prevalent. This sponsorship, attached to the serials' particular style of heightened emotion and melodrama, led to the label 'soap opera'.
(Brook, 2003-2010, Online)

This name was kept when the dramas moved to television and the characteristics of the soap remained relatively similar to previous years. The BBC and ITV public ethos confirmed that the genre needed to evolve with time and new systems and structures were put in place.

Narrative structures can be seen in all forms of film and television. Most texts can be analysed in terms of the ‘classic’ narrative, the storytelling, using two elements; the ‘showing’ (mimesis) of the story and the ‘telling’ (diagesis) of the plot. The mimetic qualities are not linked to time like the narrative but are linked to “forms of representation” (Holland, 1997, page 121), such as the portrayal of women, sexuality and adolescence. In soaps the narrative ‘tells’ the story of issues relevant in contemporary society by showing characters in everyday situations as in real-life with, ‘real’ friends and ‘real’ family. Sensitive issues are also looked at; for example the fortnightly magazine Soaplife states that the head of UK Grants, Comic Relief explains

It is vital that we continue to alert young people to the dangers if we are to stop them being exploited and the opportunity to work with Eastenders will make a huge audience aware of this issue. We have been working with scriptwriters and some of the young women from projects we support to ensure the story reflects the reality of young people caught up in sexual exploitation.
 (Brockway, 2011, page 28)

These issues are sensitive and the writers have to successfully create a ‘real’ atmosphere for a storyline like this to work and help to introduce viewers to real-life issues. These ‘classic’ narratives also need a critical framework to help the narrative ‘flow’. Watching television is a domestic activity that to a point socialises friends and family. The home has many distractions - unlike a cinema auditorium, television is just a box in the corner. Even though it may be on for most of the day, domestic distractions can disrupt the viewing experience creating “wallpaper TV”. (Jones, 2006, Online) 

As television rarely has full attention of the viewer, television programmes are worked into sections, about five minutes long, and apart from the BBC this includes advertising, creating a longer narrative. Storylines in the soap opera are easily picked up and as Chandler informs

Soaps are unlike traditional dramas (e.g. sit-coms) which have a beginning, a middle and an end: soaps have no beginning or end, no structural closure. They do not build up towards an ending or closure of meaning. Viewers can join a soap at any point. There is no single narrative line: several stories are woven together over a number of episodes. In this sense the plots of soaps are not linear.
(Chandler, 1994, online)

They allow for stories to run parallel alongside each other throughout an episode, switching from character to character. This breaks up the viewing experience and ensures the viewer is continuously entertained. The sections in soap are intended to be easy to follow - no deep thinking – just flowing through as life does, not fast paced as film suggests. The sections are full of cliff-hangers that make the viewer ‘wait and watch’. Raymond Williams who named the concept of flow claims that the segments do not mean anything on their own, so they flow together to build a longer segment, becoming homogenised, everything resembling everything else (Jones, 2006, Online). These narrative sections favour domestic issues such as marriage, relationships, adolescence, rape, prostitution, racism and recently Eastenders’ cot-death. Gottlieb explains that

confrontation of social issues […] with social reality within the soap format started when the home-produced British soaps, Coronation Street, 1960- […] were joined by the newcomers […] EastEnders, 1985 (BBC1).
(Gottlieb, 1993, page 41)

By providing a platform to understand these issues and find ways of ‘getting through’ the traumas of everyday life, soaps are therefore based around mainstream ideology, with restrictions being placed on content due to the watershed. Television style is different to film in that it is domesticated and based mainly around sound, not spectacle like the film. This is due to the distractions in the home, sound drawing the viewer back to the television, with the noise of conversation, ‘talking heads’. Due to the main content in soaps being that of conversation, the visuals do not focus on mise-en-scene, but realism. The narrative should follow the codes of realism. According to Holland 

A television drama should have a surface accuracy, that is an accuracy of costume, setting and props. […] it should obey the laws of cause and effect, and explain itself adequately to its audience […] It should conform to expectations based on psychology and character so that the characters remain consistent even when 'weird' and 'unnatural' events take place. The fictional world should be governed by spatial and temporal verisimilitude […] A plot should not stray too far from what we expect to happen. This means that it should obey the laws of physical and natural science, unless it is dealing in the supernatural
(Holland, 1997, page 124)

Holland means if someone has an umbrella it must be raining, if the character is a police officer they wear a real uniform. Characters should keep consistent personalities and events should not be far-fetched but true to society. Shots are mainly close ups, two-shots or multi-shots of the characters conversing. As this technique is not as captivating as film visuals, the shot reverse shots are quicker in television to keep the viewer entertained. This style has an effect on the viewer’s emotions as the characters are people, part of the viewer’s everyday life. With Coronation Street running from 1960 and still running after fifty years, and Eastenders also running since 1985, the viewer has been socially conditioned to watch the soap - particularly women, enabling the viewer to ‘grow up’ with the characters, which allows for emotive responses, evident in real friendships and relationships. The storylines are believable and true to society’s issues and constraints, whereas film can be a little far-fetched, therefore becoming a spectacle. Television’s realism comes from the characters’ authenticity and the plausibility of the storylines. 

            Characters live their life ‘live’ onscreen, parallel with reality; Valentine’s Day will be Valentine’s Day and Christmas will be Christmas “central to its nature as a domestic medium” (Jones, 2006, Online). With recent chart music and news stories mentioned in the soaps, the viewer feels as though they are watching events unravel onscreen; ’real-life’ stories, not just real-time stories. ITV recently celebrated Coronation Street’s fiftieth birthday by shooting a one million pound live episode; the viewer literally watching the actors live out their double life, live. The ‘live’ feeling of the soap opera is not continuous as the episode would suggest, but the actors move from set to set, as in film. For example, in film someone knocks at the door, then a cut to a shot of two people talking on a sofa. In Soap we would see a character knock at the door then we would see the other side of the door where another character is opening it. Then we would see the characters walk into the house and to the sofa. This continuous flow of events, allow us to feel comfortable in believing that what we are watching is in real-time.

The soap opera undoubtedly does show a challenging representation in terms of its narrative construction and the continuous flow of real-time events. Christine Geraghty states “the longer they run the more impossible it seems to imagine them ending” (Geraghty, 1991, page 11), since they have been a part of British television history for more than fifty years. With the never-ending serials and the open narrative, gripping cliff-hangers and continuous parallel storylines, the soap allows one to immerse themselves in a world that is ‘real’ in the sense that they feel part of the story sharing the character’s emotions. The viewer feels as though they have more of an understanding about the issues evident in society.


Bibliography
Brockway, S., (2011) ‘Whitney Hits Rock Bottom’, Soaplife. Issue 243, page 28.
Brook, M., (2003-2010) Soap Opera. [ONLINE] http://www.screenonline.org.uk/tv/id/519828/index.html  (Accessed 14/02.2011)
Chandler, D., (1994) ‘The TV Soap Opera Genre and its Viewers’ [ONLINE] http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/TF33120/soaps.html (Accessed 14/02/2011)
Geraghty, C., (1991) Women and Soap Opera: A Study of Prime -Time Soaps. Cambridge: Polity Press
Gottlieb, V (1993), 'Brookside: Damon's YTS comes to an end (Barry Woodward) Paradoxes and contradictions.’ In British Television Drama in the 1980s, Brandt, G, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Page 40-61.
Holland, P. (1997), 'Narrative Television', The Television Handbook. London: Routledge, page 113-136.
Jones, S., (2006) ‘How to Teach Narrative’ [ONLINE] http://www.medienabc.org/page5/page23/page29/page29.html (Accessed 13/02/2011)

Filmography
Eastenders (1985-2011) BBC. UK: BBC
Coronation Street (1960-2011) ITV. UK: ITV











By Lea Weller BA




No comments:

Post a Comment