Friday, 17 May 2013

National Identity in America’s Last House on the Left (1972) and Japan’s Battle Royale (2000) By Lea Weller BA










I will explore the possibility of film ‘speaking’ of national identity, and will investigate two separate national films, one from America and one from Japan. The two examples chosen to be analysed are American director Wes Craven’s Last House on the Left (1972) and Japanese director Fukasaku Kinji’s Millennium film Battle Royale (2000). Explanations will be given about different aspects of political and civil anxieties felt throughout the nation and the way these anxieties are dealt with in the film. Both films are very violent and have both been critically slated and reviewed as disgusting and unwatchable. This essay will determine the national identity crisis in both films and explain the reasons for the points made.

Wes Craven’s Last House on the Left (1972) represents the violence and inhumane acts that dominated much of the 1960s and 1970s, when the Vietnam War traumatized Americans. ‘‘Wes Craven’s The Last House on the Left (1972) […] played on the films notoriety’’ (Chibnall and Petley, 2002, pg 146). This was a national crisis as America was split politically and whether it is right wing or left wing, for war or against the war, black or white, straight or gay, old or young, working class versus middle class and as Adam Lowenstein (2005) also states the bourgeois culture versus the counterculture and even patriarchy versus feminism. These oppositions moved further apart and grew stronger individually, during the Vietnam War. So this shows the ‘‘historical trauma of these years’’ (Lowenstein, 2005, pg 112) Lowenstein also quotes Rogin as he states that ‘’political demonology’’, was part of traditional American politics. He suggests that the idea of political demonology is manifest through the replacement of true historical moments with ‘’visionary myth’’ and Last House on the Left works both with and against this idea. The characters on both sides, both good and evil, show the monstrous yet realistic monsters of political demonology, and as Lowenstein states ‘’Last House can confront he divisive historical trauma of the Vietnam era along the axes of political demonology that constitute it.’’ (Lowenstein, 2005, pg 113)
            
         Last House on the Left shows a representation of the real in a rape- revenge narrative form. Moral messages are shown in the film, ‘’what Brooks refers to as the ‘moral occult’.’’ (Nicholas, 2009. Pg 1) which it finds in the socio-political circumstances in post-1960s United States during the disturbing Vietnam War. Last House on the Left makes the audience visualise the reality of sexual assault that happens in everyday life. The film depicts the good versus evil, showing the corruption of innocent young women. The rape-revenge narrative is not the main interest in the film though. The setting for the Last House on the Left is the United States of America, in which the Vietnam war was affecting the daily life of everyone therefore ‘’For Adam Lowenstein, the film responds to an ‘extraordinary national crisis in the late 1960s and early 1970s’.’’ (Nicholas, 2009, pg 6) Last House on the Left asserts the sequences of the brutal acts of violence and habitual everyday life. According to Nicholas ‘’the moral occult in Last House on the Left also suggests that revenge is a futile, hollow act, [...] violence only begets more violence.’’ (Nicholas, 2009, pg 7). This social warning to young women is not only an anxiety for Americans but for the rest of the world too. Teenage girls are extremely vulnerable and every parent is terrified of it happening to their daughter. 

         When Last House on the Left was made it caused a lot controversy due to the violence and vengeful acts that are depicted onscreen and are seen as private crimes that should not be publicised. The main plot is two teenage girls travelling to New York to see a rock band. They are kidnapped by a group of escaped criminals who rape, torture then murder the teenagers. The criminals then stay the night at one of the girl’s parents claiming that they need shelter for the night. The parent find out who the convicts are and what they have done and decide to enact revenge on the gang of criminals that ‘’mirrors the violence visited on their daughter.’’ (Lowenstein, 2009, pg 113), and the film shows the monstrous in both good and evil. Showing that even the most placid and moral people, can become monsters if the right triggers are activated. The advertising campaign for Last House on the Left, was a picture of a girl with long dark hair, her arms stretched out in despair and a look of absolute horror and distress on her face. The campaign mimics and resembles a photograph taken by photographer John Filo, that shows the events at Kent State University on 4th May 1970, when a student anti-war protester had been shot when the National Guardsmen shot at the students that were demonstrating their anguish. 

This campaign and the word ‘left’ in the title of the film suggests that this was around the time when the left wing and right wing oppositions warred and the anti-war movement were informed that President Nixon was to invade Cambodia and if you disagreed they would shoot you. ‘’What the ad’s disclaimer refers to as ‘’the senseless violence and inhuman cruelty that has become so much a part of the times in which we live.’’ (Lowenstein, 2005, pg 115). This was a concern of the nation as a whole and the brutal scenes in Last House on the Left caused outrage and it is stated that

The ordeal begins with Phyllis’s offscreen rape, and continues with the graphic depiction of Phyllis forced to urinate on herself, Mari and Phyllis coerced to make love to each other, Mari scarred by Krug’s carving of his name in her skin, Phyllis stabbed and disembowelled, and finally Mari raped and shot to death. 
(Lowenstein, 2005, pg 118)

These scenes of the criminal gang Krug, Weasel, Junior and Sadie-otherwise known as the Stillo’s, are like hippies in the sense that they smoke drugs and do not adhere to ‘bourgeois’ family values, and they have no morals when it comes to sexual activity and the law in general.

One of Craven’s trademarks is the ‘’elaborately schemed and painstakingly executed... variety show of vengeance,’’ Consisting of imagery including ‘’murderous hammers, chainsaws, short circuits etc.
(Schneider and Williams, 2005, pg 297)

         The murders done with objects that would be used for one thing or another when living in the country or suburban town. The Stillo’s represent a real country family that America was scared of - a countercultural family of murderers the Manson family. There is also a class divide in this film showing the divide in class throughout America in the 1960s and 1970s. The Parent’s- the Collingwood’s, mocked their daughter for being friends with a working-class girl. Not only does it go the other way, but the Stillo’s mimic the Collingwood’s mannerisms and speech at the dinner table to try and fit in but they fail due to taking advantage of their hospitality and this is evidence to show the two opposing sides in the film; the bourgeois middle-class culture, and the working-class counterculture. The news and the reporters made the Americans look like the ‘good side’ throughout the Vietnam war but Last House on the Left wanted to show how life really was during the Vietnam war for Americans and wanted to inform people that ‘ordinary’ people are monsters too, no matter which class, age, or gender they are. Last House on the Left was made around the Hollywood Renaissance between the 1960s and 1970s when many Directors made ‘’risk’’ films. Another horror film that speaks of national identity is a Japanese film made by the director Fukasaku kinji. Battle Royale (2000) is portrayed and spoke about as a disgusting violent film, but the underlying message is actually anti-violence. It is “Conscious of the Columbine Syndrome,’’ (McRoy, 2005, pg 130) the fear of violent boys and their actions when they are placed under immense pressure. Tony Williams (2005) states that Battle Royale acts like a mirror reflecting back all of the society’s problems that Japans faces or has faced in the past. Battle Royale also shows problems that are also relevant to the rest of western society. This film shows what post-capitalism entails, and evidence of a ‘return of the repressed’ problem which will result in violent apocalyptic acts, that could be embraced by other nations.
             
         Battle Royale shows how after the nineteenth century military development, schools had become like the military, and they were there not for the students benefit and education, but for the ‘’good of the country.’’ (McRoy, 2005, pg 131) Williams states in McRoy that ‘’Elementary school teachers were trained like military recruits, with student-teachers housed in barracks and subject to harsh discipline and indoctrination’.’’ (McRoy, 2005, pg 132) the film shows how the teacher Hayashida, of the class that has been picked for The Battle Royale, is murdered by the military for protesting against his class being taken. He also speaks to the students as if they are equals and it seems that he does not have an isolated teacher-student authority, like the military trains. Kitano on the other hand is ruthless, cruel and completely estrange from the students, as Kitano states ‘’Hayashida is ‘a no good adult’, and he urges his prospective Battle Royale competitors ‘to work hard not to become like [Hayashida]’. (McRoy, 2005, pg 132). 

           The Japanese education system had been culturally conditioned, strictly controlled and mechanical since 1930 (McRoy, 2005, pg132). The film in itself is very militarized ‘’ which was anarchic and set in the brutal and amoral present’’ (Richie, 2001, pg 179), showing the unemployment rise, students skipping school and the youth being violent and disrespectful towards adults; shown in the case of Nobu stabbing Kitano when he was their school teacher, and with the failing economy Battle Royale is a reaction to these problems when they escalate too far, and as Williams quotes Ellis to keep the ‘’social structure’’ from ‘’breaking down’’. The film shows the national crisis that Japan faces, its policies and systems in crisis and in Battle Royale portrays a ‘no tolerance’ policy by taking badly behaved students an forcing them to kill each other to fight for their right to be an adult and live their life, this due to the ignorance of respect and gratitude towards the militarized adults. The holocaust in Nanking in 1937 is linked with the film in showing the very similar cultural system and the horrific violence involved in both the film and the holocaust.

The students picked for the Battle Royale were in the ninth grade, and the Japanese education system works in the way that if you attend class then you automatically move up a grade until the ninth grade when all Japanese students are to take nationwide exams in order to achieve a placement at a highly classed secondary school. Many suicides have been recorded in Japan due to the emotional stress and intense pressure faced by the students. One of the students in Battle Royale states that he will survive and kill as many others as he can so he can ‘go to a good school,’ so the pressures of the Japanese education system are shown significantly in the film. Williams states that

The opening captions reveal a world in turmoil and a nation planning a special type of ‘Dies Irae’ for its rebellious younger population ‘At the dawn of the millennium the nation collapsed. 15% unemployment, 10 million out of work. 800,000 students boycotted school. The adults lost confidence and, fearing the youth, passed the Millennium Educational Reform Act, aka The BR Act’. (McRoy, 2005, pg 134)

Later in the film we see a survivor of the previous Battle Royale, covered in blood, accompanied by news images showing the media involved in the Act. There is contradicted optimism throughout the film due to the Japanese controls and personal feelings fighting against each other. The students are forced to work alone to prove they can survive in a ‘dog eat dog’ world in the future as adults. They have explosive necklaces to ensure they do not try and escape or work together to revolt against the system. As previously mentioned before just as in schools, the students are under pressure, so a few of the characters commit suicide by jumping off a cliff or hanging themselves due to the emotional stress of the situation. Also if they disobey the rules they will also get killed by the explosive necklaces they wear. Showing the control the Japanese military has over the situation. Elements of the 1960s Japanese revolution are shown in Battle Royale when different collectives of teenagers try to find different escapes from this horror. The character Mimura tells his friends he is hiding with that, ‘when we escape, it will be together,’ as Mimura hacks into the military computers and manages to interfere with the signals for 15 minutes in order to deactivate the necklaces, so they can start their own revolution and blow up the school headquarters on the island to stop the BR Act. The fact that the BR headquarters is an old schoolroom on the now deserted island shows the connection of the education system in Japan in which ‘war’ is compulsory. The education system in Japan uses the advantage of adolescent vulnerability and the competitive nature of education and employment in which ‘’the ‘post-moral’ social force against which humanity and the limits of human agency are played out and tested.’ (Standish, 2005, pg 334) the students have to follow the same rules in the game in order to survive and become successful in the future.
           
        Another national anxiety of failure is evident throughout Battle Royale is failure. Kitano believes he is a failed parent as he is disrespected by his own daughter on the phone. During the film Kitano saves Noriko from Mitsuko and tells her not to catch cold and hands her an umbrella, showing us his fatherly traits yet he is aware that he is contradicting the system himself in his own mind. Kawada’s voiceover seems to reside over scenes involving Kitano, as Williams states ‘’as if the director expresses certain reservations over a younger generation growing up to become other versions of Kitano.’’ (McRoy, 2005, pg 141). This film is a warning of apocalyptic traits, it is against violence and it opposes the Japanese education system that the Japanese impose on their students. The warning is also relevant to western cultures in the case of capitalism setting people against each other.

            Battle Royale is what Williams describes as an ‘Apocalyptic Millennial Warning’ (McRoy, 2005, pg 92) the film shows the anxieties that Japan has over its own systems and economy. Some of the anxieties shown in the film are international problems too so this film appeals to an international audience, in the events of separating the nation as failures or achievers and showing the struggle they face against the political educational system. Similarly Last House on the Left shows the national identity crisis in America during the Vietnam era when barbaric images from Vietnam were being shown in the media and on television. There were many anti-war protests that ended violently, one case being at Kent State University in 1970, not to mention the Manson family murders which the criminal characters in the film remind us of, and the fact that the Collingwood’s retaliated with similar violence, show us that no matter what class, age or gender, the compulsion to be monstrous and violent depends on the situation in which you are faced. This applies to both of the films studied in this essay and they both show that horror films can speak of national identity and the anxieties of the nation.
 
Bibliography
Chibnall, S., and Petley, J., (2002) British Horror Cinema (eds.) London: Routledge.

Lowenstein, A., (2005) Shocking Representations: Historical Trauma, National Cinema, and the Modern Horror Film. New York: Columbia University Press.

McRoy, J., (2005) Japanese Horror Cinema (Ed.). UK: Edinburgh University Press

Nicholas, A. H., (2009) ‘Last Trope on the Left: Rape, Film and the Melodramatic Imagination’ in Limina: A Journal of Historical and Cultural Studies. Vol. 15 pg 1-13. [ONLINE] http://www.limina.arts.uwa.edu.au/current/hellernicholas?f=252877 (Accessed 05/05/2010)

Richie, D., (2001) A Hundred Years of Japanese Film. London: Kodansha International

Schneider, S. J., and Williams, T., (2005) Horror International (eds.) USA: Wayne State University Press.

Standish, I., (2005) A New History of Japanese Cinema: A Century of Narrative Film. London: Continuum.

Filmography

Battle Royale (2000) Fukasaku Kinji. Japan: Battle Royale Production Committee.

Last House on the Left (1972) Wes Craven. USA: Lobster Enterprises.
            

 By Lea Weller BA

No comments:

Post a Comment